How it works

The five stages, the dashboard, MODE, and eval-cell authoring.

Last updated July 10, 2026

How it works

A supership run is five stages driven by real code. The main agent authors eval cells that call the named global agents and record everything to a self-rendering dashboard.

flowchart TD
    C[0 Clarify<br/>interactive only] --> P[1 Plan<br/>planner to plan.html]
    P --> G{Approval gate<br/>interactive only}
    G -->|approved| E[2 Execute<br/>sequential / parallel]
    E --> R[3 Review loop<br/>reviewers to judge to verify to fix]
    R -->|clean round| K[4 Consolidate<br/>Lessons + debt]
    R -->|findings remain| E2[re-review after fixes]
    E2 --> R

The five stages

  1. Clarify. The planner in CLARIFY mode returns a dependency-ordered question tree, each question carrying a recommended answer it derived from the code. The main agent then grills you one question at a time, upstream decisions first, and produces a CLARIFIED SPEC. That spec, not the raw request, becomes the run's TASK. Auto runs skip this entirely.
  2. Plan. The planner in PLAN mode returns a structured plan. The main agent writes it to the dashboard. See Planning.
  3. Execute. Workers implement each piece. The wave shape (sequential, disjoint parallel, or overlapping parallel) comes from the plan. See Execution.
  4. Review. The shared review loop fans reviewers out per lens, judges, verifies, and fixes until a clean round. See Review.
  5. Consolidate. Final state is written, lessons and debt are harvested, and per-repo memory captures the lessons. See Consolidate.

The dashboard

Durable state lives in .planning/<slug>/plan.html. The <script id="plan-data"> JSON is canonical and the visible page is a derived render. Open it in a browser and it live-refreshes every five seconds while the run is active, then stops once the status is done or failed.

Every write is code-driven from the pipeline, never trusted to agent memory, so the dashboard cannot drift from reality. The file is the source of truth. Each eval cell re-reads it, which is what makes the whole run resume-safe. The page is dark, dependency-free, file://-safe, and renders with textContent only so agent text cannot inject markup.

MODE, interactive versus auto

MODE is set in the first eval cell.

  • interactive (via /supership, /ultraship) runs the clarify interview and pauses at the approval gate. The plan's status starts as awaiting_approval.
  • auto (via /shipit, /ultrashipit) skips both. Cell 1 sets the approval state to auto and the status to building, so Cell 2 runs immediately.

Eval cells and the recursion-depth rule

The main agent authors and runs the pipeline as eval cells with language: "py", using agent(), parallel(), and completion(). Orchestration is never handed to a nested orchestrator agent.

Every cell is the assignment lines plus the SHARED HELPERS block plus that cell's body. The eval kernel persists state between cells, but re-including the helpers is harmless and keeps each cell runnable cold (which is how resume works).

Recursion depth is a hard contract. The main agent is depth 0, each agent() child adds 1, and a spawner may call agent() only while its depth is below task.maxRecursionDepth (the eval hard cap is 3). Authoring the pipeline at depth 0 keeps consultants you spawn at depth 1, which leaves them room for their own scouts at depth 2. This is why the kit asks for maxRecursionDepth: 3.

Search Documentation

Search for pages and content